This post started as a comment in response to Navya’s comment to my last post. But once it assumed its current length I decided to put it as a separate post. So, ideally this one should be read in conjunction with the last para of my previous post & Navya’s comment on that.
So let me start by presenting you a scenario.
Let’s assume there is this very difficult but extremely prestigious exam on Nuclear Physics that people from world over take. Among the numerous participants, there is one 42 year old eminent Nuclear Scientist & a 14-year old class Xth kid. Now when the results, come in our kid or whiz kid (whatever you wanna call him) scores 97 out of 100..Amazing…people stand up to take note, a 14 year old scoring 97 in such a difficult exam. He was hailed everywhere, got standing ovation wherever he went, was interviewed by media as if they have no one else to interview etc. etc. No denying that for a 14 year old to achieve what he did deserves all accolades that he got. But our eminent scientist let’s just call him Mr. K (scientists like such names) scored 98 which was highest among all participants. For a 42 year old nuclear scientist to score highest in a nuclear physics exam is commendable but no miracle.
Now entire public, media and our whizkid himself is demanding that he is declared the topper of this exam notwithstanding that Mr. K scored higher marks. Almost everyone is saying that kid is pure genius (which is something I am not denying) and so he deserves this honour but my problem is he is still the second best in absolute terms. May be if we revise the merit list on Score/Age basis, he would top it but on absolute score basis, Mr. K deserves the honour of topping this exam.
Case of this TZP kid – Darsheel – is same – he may have done great for his age and therefore deserve a special jury/critics award but not the best actor one. That should go to the guy who acted best irrespective of whether he has done 150 movies before or if he is 42, 52, 62. Now, limited question is, are you seeing him as a kid who acted exceedingly well or an actor who acted well. And when I look at him from latter point of view, I don’t see him as the best MAN. But then that’s merely my two Singapore cents.
Personally, I also believe that people are getting swayed by superb emotional appeal that TZP holds and therefore over-rating the kid’s effort (which doesn’t mean that I don’t think he is excellent but just that I don’t think he is something humanity has never seen before) but then that’s an extremely personal view which I won’t even like to present as an argument.
And finally to all Darsheel supporters – IQ comment in my last post was extremely light hearted, just in keeping with the tone of the post and it was not meant to disparage the intellect of any terrestrial or extra-terrestrial being (or for that matter, artificial intelligence of any super-computer even). And I hope no one took any offence to it, if you did my heartfelt apologies.
2 comments:
well.. ur entire hypothesis is wrong bcoz i was referring to a scenario in which both whizkid & oldie score 98. and then again ur hypothesis cant be used bcoz art is not easily quantifiable like science. it is a matter of perception. i merely said i PERCEIVED Darsheel's acting to be at par with SRK's, in say Chak De.
Anyways, Darsheel has again been been nominated in the best actor category (and not best chold actor categpry)of the 53rd Filmfare Awards. He has been nominated along with Abhishek Bachchan(Guru), Akshay Kumar Namastey London), Shah Rukh Khan for Chak De! India and Om Shanti Om, and Shahid Kapoor(Jab We Met).
This is all what I also suggested in my humble opinion, that his acting deserves to be compared at par with these actors' performance of 2007. Winning or not is a diff matter & Jury might consider diff angles.
Disclaimer: The views above are entirely mine own & are not meant to counter a diff perception anyone else have. Since I dont have a blog I just did a piggy back on ur blog to express my opinion about a subject you brought up. I am anyways glad to see that my comments are providing lot of ideas for you to blog. :)
I concur with your views as long as lot of people believe that the kid 'acted' at par with others he should get the nomination or even the award :)
I just felt he is not really upto that level but then there is that big 'I' in the beginning of that sentence ;-)
Post a Comment